No. | Number of certificates | Category | Extended category | Rank | Expired date |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
CAT-00001454 |
Giám sát thi công xây dựng công trình |
Giám sát công tác xây dựng công trình Giao thông (Cầu) Cầu |
III |
10/12/2029 |
3 |
CAT-00001454 |
Giám sát thi công xây dựng công trình |
Giám sát thi công xây dựng công trình Hạ tầng kỹ thuật (Cấp nước, Nghĩa trang) Cấp nước, Nghĩa trang |
III |
09/01/2030 |
4 |
CAT-00001454 |
Giám sát thi công xây dựng công trình |
Giám sát công tác xây dựng công trình: Nông nghiệp và Phát triển nông thôn (cống, kênh), Cống, kênh |
III |
02/03/2030 |
5 |
CAT-00001454 |
Thiết kế, thẩm tra thiết kế xây dựng công trình |
Thiết kế xây dựng công trình Dân dụng |
II |
05/06/2030 |
6 |
CAT-00001454 |
Thiết kế, thẩm tra thiết kế xây dựng công trình |
Thiết kế xây dựng công trình Giao thông (Cầu, Đường bộ) Cầu, Đường bộ |
III |
05/06/2030 |
7 |
CAT-00001454 |
Thiết kế, thẩm tra thiết kế xây dựng công trình |
Thiết kế xây dựng công trình HTKT (Cấp – Thoát nước) Cấp – Thoát nước |
III |
05/06/2030 |
8 |
CAT-00001454 |
Quản lý dự án đầu tư xây dựng |
Tư vấn quản lý dự án đầu tư xây dựng công trình Dân dụng |
II |
05/06/2030 |
This construction organization is also a contractor. The results of data analysis for contractors CÔNG TY CP TƯ VẤN PHÁT TRIỂN are as follows:
You need to Login or Sign up to view all informations.
- Participated in 22 bidding packages, of which 13 were won, 9 were lost, 0 are pending results, and 0 were canceled.
- Total value of winning bid packages (including joint ventures): VND (In which VND are designated bid packages; VND are bid packages with KQLCNT but no TBMT; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)
Note: This is the total value of the bid packages that the contractor has won, including bid packages participating as a joint venture. This figure is calculating the total value of the entire joint venture. Because the participation rate in the joint venture is not announced, we do not have the basis to accurately separate the data for each member of the joint venture. The above figures may be larger than the actual figures that the contractor won.
- Total bid-winning value as an independent party: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)
- Total value of bidding packages participated in and won as a consortium: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice) (Winning bid value of all consortium members)
- Lowest bid rate when participating: 48.19% (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
- Average bid-winning price compared to the estimated price: 78.74% (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
- Provinces participated in the bidding: Cần Thơ (12), Hậu Giang (3), Undefined (7)
- Has relationships with 15 Bid Solicitors
- Has competed against 31 contractors in 12 bidding packages, won 4 packages, lost 8 packages, 0 are pending results, and 0 were canceled.
- Has collaborated with 1 contractors in 1 bidding packages, won 1 packages, lost 0 packages, 0 are pending results, and 0 were canceled.
- Received 0 penalty decisions due to violations of bidding regulations.
blockquote>
- Published contractor selection plan of 11 project with total 53 bidding packages.
- Invitation for bids 9 package (with 9 bidding notice), conduct prequalification 0 package.
- Results announced of 15 packages, cancel bids 0 packages (among the packages above).
- Yes 6 packages with results without Tender/Prequalified notification .