No. | Number of certificates | Category | Extended category | Rank | Expired date |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
DAN-00002116 |
Khảo sát xây dựng |
Địa hình |
III |
21/04/2032 |
2 |
DAN-00002116 |
Thiết kế, thẩm tra thiết kế xây dựng công trình |
Dân dụng |
III |
21/04/2032 |
3 |
DAN-00002116 |
Thiết kế, thẩm tra thiết kế xây dựng công trình |
Hạ tầng kỹ thuật |
III |
21/04/2032 |
4 |
DAN-00002116 |
Giám sát thi công xây dựng công trình |
Thủy lợi |
III |
21/04/2032 |
5 |
DAN-00002116 |
Giám sát thi công xây dựng công trình |
Hạ tầng kỹ thuật |
III |
21/04/2032 |
6 |
DAN-00002116 |
Thi công xây dựng công trình |
Giao thông cầu đường bộ |
III |
21/04/2032 |
7 |
DAN-00002116 |
Giám sát thi công xây dựng công trình |
Hạ tầng kỹ thuật |
III |
21/04/2032 |
8 |
DAN-00002116 |
Thi công xây dựng công trình |
Dân dụng |
III |
21/04/2032 |
9 |
DAN-00002116 |
Thi công xây dựng công trình |
Thủy lợi |
III |
21/04/2032 |
This construction organization is also a contractor. The results of data analysis for contractors CÔNG TY TRÁCH NHIỆM HỮU HẠN DỊCH VỤ ĐÔ THỊ LD are as follows:
You need to Login or Sign up to view all informations.
- Participated in 158 bidding packages, of which 92 were won, 56 were lost, 6 are pending results, and 4 were canceled.
- Total value of winning bid packages (including joint ventures): VND (In which VND are designated bid packages; VND are bid packages with KQLCNT but no TBMT; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)
Note: This is the total value of the bid packages that the contractor has won, including bid packages participating as a joint venture. This figure is calculating the total value of the entire joint venture. Because the participation rate in the joint venture is not announced, we do not have the basis to accurately separate the data for each member of the joint venture. The above figures may be larger than the actual figures that the contractor won.
- Total bid-winning value as an independent party: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)
- Total value of bidding packages participated in and won as a consortium: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice) (Winning bid value of all consortium members)
- Lowest bid rate when participating: 44.77% (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
- Average bid-winning price compared to the estimated price: 94.77% (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
- Provinces participated in the bidding: Đà Nẵng (34), Đắk Nông (17), Đồng Nai (17), Bình Thuận (12), Lâm Đồng (7), Kiên Giang (7), Đắk Lắk (6), Phú Yên (4), Tây Ninh (3), Quảng Ngãi (3), TP.Hồ Chí Minh (3), Khánh Hòa (2), Quảng Nam (2), Bình Dương (2), Đồng Tháp (2), Gia Lai (2), Bình Phước (2), Hà Nội (1), Ninh Thuận (1), Long An (1), An Giang (1), Cà Mau (1), Hải Dương (1), Kon Tum (1), Undefined (27)
- Has relationships with 93 Bid Solicitors
- Has competed against 110 contractors in 103 bidding packages, won 41 packages, lost 55 packages, 4 are pending results, and 3 were canceled.
- Has collaborated with 15 contractors in 22 bidding packages, won 16 packages, lost 5 packages, 0 are pending results, and 1 were canceled.
- Received 0 penalty decisions due to violations of bidding regulations.
blockquote>
- Published contractor selection plan of 0 project with total 0 bidding packages.
- Invitation for bids 0 package (with 0 bidding notice), conduct prequalification 0 package.
- Results announced of 0 packages, cancel bids 0 packages (among the packages above).
- Yes 0 packages with results without Tender/Prequalified notification .