| No. | Number of certificates | Category | Extended category | Rank | Expired date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
KOT-00027612 |
Thiết kế, thẩm tra thiết kế xây dựng công trình |
Nông nghiệp và Phát triển nông thôn thủy lợi |
III |
01/08/2029 |
3 |
KOT-00027612 |
Thi công xây dựng công trình |
Nông nghiệp và Phát triển nông thôn thủy lợi |
III |
01/08/2029 |
This construction organization is also a contractor. The results of data analysis for contractors MLEAD ONE MEMBER LIMITED COMPANY are as follows:
You need to Login or Sign up to view all informations.
- Participated in 100 bidding packages, of which 40 were won, 56 were lost, 3 are pending results, and 1 were canceled.
- Total value of winning bid packages (including joint ventures): VND (In which VND are designated bid packages; VND are bid packages with KQLCNT but no TBMT; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)
Note: This is the total value of the bid packages that the contractor has won, including bid packages participating as a joint venture. This figure is calculating the total value of the entire joint venture. Because the participation rate in the joint venture is not announced, we do not have the basis to accurately separate the data for each member of the joint venture. The above figures may be larger than the actual figures that the contractor won.
- Total bid-winning value as an independent party: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)
- Total value of bidding packages participated in and won as a consortium: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice) (Winning bid value of all consortium members)
- Lowest bid rate when participating: 51.3% (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
- Average bid-winning price compared to the estimated price: 98.68% (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
- Provinces after the merger where the contractor has participated in bidding: Đà Nẵng (23), Quảng Ngãi (12), Gia Lai (11), Nghệ An (5), Tây Ninh (5), Lâm Đồng (4), Thừa Thiên - Huế (4), Hà Nội (3), Lào Cai (3), Vĩnh Long (2), TP.Hồ Chí Minh (2), Phú Thọ (2), Quảng Trị (2), Thanh Hoá (2), Hà Tĩnh (1), Tuyên Quang (1), Bắc Ninh (1), Hải Phòng (1), Đắk Lắk (1), Ninh Bình (1), Thái Nguyên (1), Khánh Hòa (1), Đồng Tháp (1), Undefined (16)
- Provinces before the merger where the contractor has participated in bidding: Quảng Nam (16), Đà Nẵng (7), Quảng Ngãi (6), Kon Tum (6), Gia Lai (5), Nghệ An (5), Tây Ninh (5), Bình Định (5), Đắk Nông (4), Thừa Thiên - Huế (4), Hà Nội (3), Trà Vinh (2), Phú Thọ (2), Quảng Bình (2), Lào Cai (2), Thanh Hoá (2), Hà Tĩnh (1), TP.Hồ Chí Minh (1), Hà Giang (1), Bắc Giang (1), Hải Dương (1), Vĩnh Phúc (1), Phú Yên (1), Ninh Bình (1), Yên Bái (1), Bà Rịa - Vũng Tàu (1), Hòa Bình (1), Thái Nguyên (1), Khánh Hòa (1), Tiền Giang (1), Undefined (17)
- Has relationships with 68 Bid Solicitors
- Has competed against 73 contractors in 77 bidding packages, won 17 packages, lost 56 packages, 3 are pending results, and 1 were canceled.
- Has collaborated with 6 contractors in 17 bidding packages, won 7 packages, lost 9 packages, 0 are pending results, and 1 were canceled.
- Received 0 penalty decisions due to violations of bidding regulations.