Please verify that you are not a robot
Security Code
| No. | Number of certificates | Category | Extended category | Rank | Expired date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
HCM-00073560 |
Thi công xây dựng công trình |
Thi công công tác xây dựng công trình dân dụng |
III |
09/06/2033 |
2 |
HCM-00073560 |
Thi công xây dựng công trình |
Thi công công tác xây dựng công trình nhà công nghiệp |
III |
09/06/2033 |
3 |
HCM-00073560 |
Thi công xây dựng công trình |
Thi công công tác xây dựng công trình công nghiệp năng lượng điện mặt trời; đường dây và trạm biến áp |
III |
09/06/2033 |
4 |
HCM-00073560 |
Thi công xây dựng công trình |
Thi công công tác xây dựng công trình giao thông đường bộ; cầu |
III |
09/06/2033 |
5 |
HCM-00073560 |
Thi công lắp đặt thiết bị vào công trình |
Dân dụng |
III |
09/06/2033 |
6 |
HCM-00073560 |
Thi công lắp đặt thiết bị vào công trình |
Nhà công nghiệp |
III |
09/06/2033 |
7 |
HCM-00073560 |
Thi công lắp đặt thiết bị vào công trình |
công nghiệp năng lượng điện mặt trời; đường dây và trạm biến áp |
III |
09/06/2033 |
This construction organization is also a contractor. The results of data analysis for contractors CLEAN ENERGY TECHNICAL SERVICE COMPANY LIMITED are as follows:
You need to Login or Sign up to view all informations.
- Participated in 32 bidding packages, of which 14 were won, 15 were lost, 3 are pending results, and 0 were canceled.
- Total value of winning bid packages (including joint ventures): VND (In which VND are designated bid packages; VND are bid packages with KQLCNT but no TBMT; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)
Note: This is the total value of the bid packages that the contractor has won, including bid packages participating as a joint venture. This figure is calculating the total value of the entire joint venture. Because the participation rate in the joint venture is not announced, we do not have the basis to accurately separate the data for each member of the joint venture. The above figures may be larger than the actual figures that the contractor won.
- Total bid-winning value as an independent party: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)
- Total value of bidding packages participated in and won as a consortium: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice) (Winning bid value of all consortium members)
- Lowest bid rate when participating: 53.82% (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
- Average bid-winning price compared to the estimated price: 93.74% (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
- Provinces participated in the bidding: Tây Ninh (31), Tiền Giang (1)
- Has relationships with 9 Bid Solicitors
- Has competed against 16 contractors in 28 bidding packages, won 11 packages, lost 14 packages, 3 are pending results, and 0 were canceled.
- Has collaborated with 1 contractors in 5 bidding packages, won 2 packages, lost 3 packages, 0 are pending results, and 0 were canceled.
- Received 0 penalty decisions due to violations of bidding regulations.