No. | Number of certificates | Category | Extended category | Rank | Expired date |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
TAN-00002006 |
Thi công xây dựng công trình |
Hạ tầng kỹ thuật Công trình chiếu sáng công cộng |
III |
13/01/2026 |
2 |
TAN-00002006 |
Thi công xây dựng công trình |
Hạ tầng kỹ thuật Cấp thoát nước |
III |
19/03/2026 |
3 |
TAN-00002006 |
Thi công xây dựng công trình |
Dân dụng |
II |
14/06/2032 |
4 |
TAN-00002006 |
Thi công xây dựng công trình |
Nhà công nghiệp, phục vụ nông nghiệp và phát triển nông thôn (thủy lợi) |
III |
14/06/2032 |
5 |
TAN-00002006 |
Giám sát công tác xây dựng công trình |
Dân dụng; công nghiệp; giao thông (đường bộ); phục vụ nông nghiệp và phát triển nông thôn (thủy lợi) |
III |
14/06/2032 |
6 |
TAN-00002006 |
Thi công xây dựng công trình |
phục vụ Nông nghiệp và Phát triển nông thôn (Thủy lợi) |
II |
19/06/2033 |
7 |
TAN-00002006 |
Thi công xây dựng công trình |
giao thông (đường bộ) |
II |
17/04/2034 |
8 |
TAN-00002006 |
Thi công xây dựng công trình |
giao thông (cầu) |
III |
17/04/2034 |
9 |
TAN-00002006 |
Thi công lắp đặt thiết bị vào công trình |
III |
17/04/2034 |
This construction organization is also a contractor. The results of data analysis for contractors VŨ HOAN CO., LTD are as follows:
You need to Login or Sign up to view all informations.
- Participated in 117 bidding packages, of which 101 were won, 14 were lost, 0 are pending results, and 2 were canceled.
- Total value of winning bid packages (including joint ventures): VND (In which VND are designated bid packages; VND are bid packages with KQLCNT but no TBMT; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)
Note: This is the total value of the bid packages that the contractor has won, including bid packages participating as a joint venture. This figure is calculating the total value of the entire joint venture. Because the participation rate in the joint venture is not announced, we do not have the basis to accurately separate the data for each member of the joint venture. The above figures may be larger than the actual figures that the contractor won.
- Total bid-winning value as an independent party: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)
- Total value of bidding packages participated in and won as a consortium: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice) (Winning bid value of all consortium members)
- Lowest bid rate when participating: 72.62% (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
- Average bid-winning price compared to the estimated price: 97.84% (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
- Provinces participated in the bidding: Tây Ninh (74), TP.Hồ Chí Minh (3), Long An (2), Undefined (38)
- Has relationships with 21 Bid Solicitors
- Has competed against 65 contractors in 50 bidding packages, won 32 packages, lost 14 packages, 2 are pending results, and 2 were canceled.
- Has collaborated with 22 contractors in 24 bidding packages, won 22 packages, lost 2 packages, 0 are pending results, and 0 were canceled.
- Received 0 penalty decisions due to violations of bidding regulations.