CÔNG TY TNHH VIỆT PHÁP

This construction organization is also a contractor. The results of data analysis for contractors CÔNG TY TNHH VIỆT PHÁP are as follows:

• Participated in 302 bidding packages, of which 145 were won, 129 were lost, 18 are pending results, and 10 were canceled.
• Total value of winning bid packages (including joint ventures): VND (In which VND are designated bid packages; VND are bid packages with KQLCNT but no TBMT; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)

  Note: This is the total value of the bid packages that the contractor has won, including bid packages participating as a joint venture. This figure is calculating the total value of the entire joint venture. Because the participation rate in the joint venture is not announced, we do not have the basis to accurately separate the data for each member of the joint venture. The above figures may be larger than the actual figures that the contractor won.

• Total bid-winning value as an independent party: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)
• Total value of bidding packages participated in and won as a consortium: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice) (Winning bid value of all consortium members)
• Lowest bid rate when participating: 65.01% (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
• Average bid-winning price compared to the estimated price: 96.33% (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
• Provinces after the merger where the contractor has participated in bidding: Phú Thọ (47), Đà Nẵng (39), Hà Nội (25), TP.Hồ Chí Minh (22), Lâm Đồng (22), Gia Lai (21), Vĩnh Long (14), Khánh Hòa (11), Đồng Tháp (8), Tây Ninh (8), Đồng Nai (8), Cần Thơ (7), Quảng Ngãi (6), Hải Phòng (5), Bắc Ninh (4), Quảng Ninh (3), An Giang (3), Nghệ An (3), Thái Nguyên (3), Đắk Lắk (3), Cao Bằng (3), Quảng Trị (3), Lào Cai (2), Cà Mau (2), Thừa Thiên - Huế (2), Hưng Yên (1), Ninh Bình (1), Undefined (26)
• Provinces before the merger where the contractor has participated in bidding: Vĩnh Phúc (45), Hà Nội (24), Đà Nẵng (22), Lâm Đồng (16), Quảng Nam (15), TP.Hồ Chí Minh (15), Gia Lai (10), Bình Định (10), Trà Vinh (6), Đồng Nai (6), Long An (5), Ninh Thuận (5), Khánh Hòa (5), Tiền Giang (5), Đắk Nông (4), Hải Dương (4), Bến Tre (4), Vĩnh Long (4), Bình Dương (4), Bắc Giang (3), Đồng Tháp (3), Quảng Ngãi (3), Quảng Ninh (3), Kon Tum (3), Nghệ An (3), Thái Nguyên (3), Đắk Lắk (3), Cao Bằng (3), Quảng Trị (3), Tây Ninh (3), Sóc Trăng (3), Hậu Giang (3), Lào Cai (2), An Giang (2), Thừa Thiên - Huế (2), Bình Phước (2), Hòa Bình (2), Cần Thơ (1), Cà Mau (1), Bắc Ninh (1), Kiên Giang (1), Hưng Yên (1), Hải Phòng (1), Bạc Liêu (1), Nam Định (1), Bà Rịa - Vũng Tàu (1), Bình Thuận (1), Undefined (34)
• Has relationships with 236 Bid Solicitors
• Has competed against 267 contractors in 224 bidding packages, won 74 packages, lost 128 packages, 15 are pending results, and 7 were canceled.
• Has collaborated with 11 contractors in 16 bidding packages, won 6 packages, lost 9 packages, 1 are pending results, and 0 were canceled.
• Received 0 penalty decisions due to violations of bidding regulations.
• Participated in consulting for 0 bidding packages with 0 roles.