Please verify that you are not a robot
Security Code
| No. | Number of certificates | Category | Extended category | Rank | Expired date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
VIP-00006172 |
Khảo sát xây dựng |
Khảo sát địa chất công trình |
III |
12/07/2023 |
3 |
VIP-00006172 |
Giám sát thi công xây dựng công trình |
Giám sát thi công xây dựng công trình: Thủy lợi. |
III |
12/07/2023 |
4 |
VIP-00006172 |
Thi công xây dựng công trình |
Thi công xây dựng công trình: Giao thông đường bộ; Dân dụng; Công nghiệp; Hạ tầng kỹ thuật; Thủy lợi. |
III |
12/07/2023 |
5 |
VIP-00006172 |
Khảo sát xây dựng |
Khảo sát địa hình công trình |
II |
29/11/2022 |
6 |
VIP-00006172 |
Thiết kế, thẩm tra thiết kế xây dựng công trình |
Thiết kế, thẩm tra thiết kế xây dựng công trình giao thông |
II |
29/11/2022 |
7 |
VIP-00006172 |
Giám sát thi công xây dựng công trình |
Giám sát thi công xây dựngcông trình Giao thông cầu đường bộ |
II |
29/11/2022 |
8 |
VIP-00006172 |
Giám sát thi công xây dựng công trình |
Giám sát thi công xây dựngcông trình Dân dụng |
III |
29/11/2022 |
This construction organization is also a contractor. The results of data analysis for contractors CÔNG TY TNHH TƯ VẤN VÀ XÂY DỰNG CÔNG TRÌNH PHÚ ANH are as follows:
You need to Login or Sign up to view all informations.
- Participated in 57 bidding packages, of which 40 were won, 2 were lost, 14 are pending results, and 1 were canceled.
- Total value of winning bid packages (including joint ventures): VND (In which VND are designated bid packages; VND are bid packages with KQLCNT but no TBMT; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)
Note: This is the total value of the bid packages that the contractor has won, including bid packages participating as a joint venture. This figure is calculating the total value of the entire joint venture. Because the participation rate in the joint venture is not announced, we do not have the basis to accurately separate the data for each member of the joint venture. The above figures may be larger than the actual figures that the contractor won.
- Total bid-winning value as an independent party: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)
- Total value of bidding packages participated in and won as a consortium: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice) (Winning bid value of all consortium members)
- Lowest bid rate when participating: 50% (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
- Average bid-winning price compared to the estimated price: 99.1% (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
- Provinces participated in the bidding: Vĩnh Phúc (49), Hà Nội (2), Bắc Giang (1), Lào Cai (1), Hà Giang (1), Hà Nam (1), Nam Định (1), Undefined (3)
- Has relationships with 35 Bid Solicitors
- Has competed against 21 contractors in 12 bidding packages, won 10 packages, lost 2 packages, 0 are pending results, and 0 were canceled.
- Has collaborated with 8 contractors in 9 bidding packages, won 7 packages, lost 2 packages, 0 are pending results, and 0 were canceled.
- Received 0 penalty decisions due to violations of bidding regulations.