| No. | Number of certificates | Category | Extended category | Rank | Expired date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
HCM-00078857 |
Tư vấn quản lý dự án đầu tư xây dựng |
Tư vấn quản lý dự án đầu tư xây dựng công trình công nghiệp |
III |
19/01/2034 |
2 |
HCM-00078857 |
Thi công xây dựng công trình |
Thi công công tác xây dựng công trình nhà công nghiệp |
III |
19/01/2034 |
3 |
HCM-00078857 |
Thi công lắp đặt thiết bị vào công trình |
Thi công lắp đặt thiết bị vào công trình dân dụng, nhà công nghiệp, công nghiệp khai thác mỏ và chế biến khoáng sản, công nghiệp năng lượng |
III |
19/01/2034 |
4 |
HCM-00078857 |
Tư vấn giám sát công tác xây dựng công trình |
Tư vấn giám sát công tác xây dựng công trình công nghiệp |
III |
19/01/2034 |
5 |
HCM-00078857 |
Tư vấn giám sát lắp đặt thiết bị công trình |
Tư vấn giám sát lắp đặt thiết bị vào công trình dân dụng, công nghiệp, hạ tầng kỹ thuật |
III |
19/01/2034 |
This construction organization is also a contractor. The results of data analysis for contractors GREEN TECHNOLOGY ELEVATOR COMPANY LIMITED are as follows:
You need to Login or Sign up to view all informations.
- Participated in 69 bidding packages, of which 19 were won, 46 were lost, 2 are pending results, and 2 were canceled.
- Total value of winning bid packages (including joint ventures): VND (In which VND are designated bid packages; VND are bid packages with KQLCNT but no TBMT; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)
Note: This is the total value of the bid packages that the contractor has won, including bid packages participating as a joint venture. This figure is calculating the total value of the entire joint venture. Because the participation rate in the joint venture is not announced, we do not have the basis to accurately separate the data for each member of the joint venture. The above figures may be larger than the actual figures that the contractor won.
- Total bid-winning value as an independent party: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)
- Total value of bidding packages participated in and won as a consortium: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice) (Winning bid value of all consortium members)
- Lowest bid rate when participating: 57.4% (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
- Average bid-winning price compared to the estimated price: 79.16% (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
- Provinces after the merger where the contractor has participated in bidding: TP.Hồ Chí Minh (32), Khánh Hòa (13), Lâm Đồng (5), Đà Nẵng (4), Gia Lai (3), Vĩnh Long (2), Đồng Tháp (2), Quảng Trị (1), An Giang (1), Đắk Lắk (1), Đồng Nai (1), Tây Ninh (1), Cần Thơ (1), Thừa Thiên - Huế (1), Undefined (1)
- Provinces before the merger where the contractor has participated in bidding: TP.Hồ Chí Minh (30), Khánh Hòa (12), Đà Nẵng (4), Lâm Đồng (3), Trà Vinh (2), Gia Lai (2), Bình Thuận (2), Bình Dương (2), Quảng Trị (1), Kiên Giang (1), Phú Yên (1), Đồng Tháp (1), Bình Phước (1), Bình Định (1), Tây Ninh (1), Hậu Giang (1), Thừa Thiên - Huế (1), Tiền Giang (1), Undefined (2)
- Has relationships with 57 Bid Solicitors
- Has competed against 64 contractors in 65 bidding packages, won 15 packages, lost 46 packages, 2 are pending results, and 2 were canceled.
- Has collaborated with 1 contractors in 1 bidding packages, won 0 packages, lost 1 packages, 0 are pending results, and 0 were canceled.
- Received 0 penalty decisions due to violations of bidding regulations.