| No. | Number of certificates | Category | Extended category | Rank | Expired date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
BDG-00015885 |
Thiết kế, thẩm tra thiết kế xây dựng công trình |
Dân dụng và công nghiệp |
III |
11/09/2033 |
2 |
BDG-00015885 |
Thi công xây dựng công trình |
Dân dụng và công nghiệp |
II |
11/09/2033 |
3 |
BDG-00015885 |
Thi công xây dựng công trình |
Hạ tầng kỹ thật. cấp, thoát nước |
III |
11/09/2033 |
This construction organization is also a contractor. The results of data analysis for contractors QUOC ANH COMPANY LIMITED. are as follows:
You need to Login or Sign up to view all informations.
- Participated in 109 bidding packages, of which 19 were won, 78 were lost, 6 are pending results, and 6 were canceled.
- Total value of winning bid packages (including joint ventures): VND (In which VND are designated bid packages; VND are bid packages with KQLCNT but no TBMT; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)
Note: This is the total value of the bid packages that the contractor has won, including bid packages participating as a joint venture. This figure is calculating the total value of the entire joint venture. Because the participation rate in the joint venture is not announced, we do not have the basis to accurately separate the data for each member of the joint venture. The above figures may be larger than the actual figures that the contractor won.
- Total bid-winning value as an independent party: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)
- Total value of bidding packages participated in and won as a consortium: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice) (Winning bid value of all consortium members)
- Lowest bid rate when participating: 69.92% (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
- Average bid-winning price compared to the estimated price: 96.52% (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
- Provinces after the merger where the contractor has participated in bidding: Lâm Đồng (29), TP.Hồ Chí Minh (15), Đồng Tháp (11), Tây Ninh (10), Đồng Nai (9), Gia Lai (6), Cần Thơ (5), Cà Mau (4), Đà Nẵng (3), Khánh Hòa (3), Vĩnh Long (3), Đắk Lắk (2), An Giang (1), Undefined (8)
- Provinces before the merger where the contractor has participated in bidding: Lâm Đồng (18), Bình Thuận (10), TP.Hồ Chí Minh (9), Đồng Tháp (7), Đồng Nai (7), Long An (6), Gia Lai (5), Bình Dương (5), Sóc Trăng (5), Tây Ninh (4), Tiền Giang (4), Cà Mau (3), Đà Nẵng (2), Bình Phước (2), Ninh Thuận (2), Bà Rịa - Vũng Tàu (1), Quảng Nam (1), Khánh Hòa (1), Vĩnh Long (1), Đắk Lắk (1), Phú Yên (1), Trà Vinh (1), An Giang (1), Bình Định (1), Đắk Nông (1), Bạc Liêu (1), Bến Tre (1), Undefined (8)
- Has relationships with 76 Bid Solicitors
- Has competed against 393 contractors in 100 bidding packages, won 11 packages, lost 77 packages, 6 are pending results, and 6 were canceled.
- Has collaborated with 15 contractors in 24 bidding packages, won 3 packages, lost 21 packages, 0 are pending results, and 0 were canceled.
- Received 0 penalty decisions due to violations of bidding regulations.