Công ty TNHH MTV tư vấn Thiết kế xây dựng Ngọc Hải Nam

Found: 14:19 22/06/2021
Certificate of Capacity in construction
00012145
Provinces/Cities (After Merger)
Provinces/Cities (Before Merger)
Address
Số 252, tổ 19, ấp Bến Cam, Xã Phước Thiền, Huyện Nhơn Trạch, Tỉnh Đồng Nai
Moderator
Representative
Nguyễn Văn Ngọc  
Position
CT Công ty kiêm Giám đốc
Tax code/ Establish decision no.
3600767229
Certification date
17/11/2005
Granting agencies
Sở Kế hoạch và Đầu tư Đồng Nai

Field of activity

No. Number of certificates Category Extended category Rank Expired date
1
DON-00012145
Thiết kế, thẩm tra thiết kế xây dựng công trình
Dân dụng
III
3
DON-00012145
Giám sát công tác xây dựng công trình
Dân dụng
III
4
DON-00012145
Giám sát công tác xây dựng công trình
Công nghiệp
III
5
DON-00012145
Giám sát công tác xây dựng công trình
NN&NPNT (thủy lợi)
III
6
DON-00012145
Thi công xây dựng công trình
Giao thông (đường bộ, cầu đường bộ)
III
7
DON-00012145
Thi công xây dựng công trình
Hạ tầng kỹ thuật (cấp thoát nước)
III
8
DON-00012145
Thi công xây dựng công trình
Dân dụng
II
31/05/2028
9
DON-00012145
Thi công xây dựng công trình
Công nghiệp (có k/cấu dạng nhà)
II
31/05/2028
10
DON-00012145
Thi công xây dựng công trình
Hạ tầng kỹ thuật: Tuyến thoát nước
II
31/05/2028
11
DON-00012145
Thi công xây dựng công trình
Giao thông: Đường bộ
II
31/05/2028

This construction organization is also a contractor. The results of data analysis for contractors Công ty TNHH MTV Tư vấn thiết kế xây dựng Ngọc Hải Nam are as follows:

  • Participated in 2 bidding packages, of which 2 were won, 0 were lost, 0 are pending results, and 0 were canceled.
  • Total value of winning bid packages (including joint ventures): VND (In which VND are designated bid packages; VND are bid packages with KQLCNT but no TBMT; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)

    Note: This is the total value of the bid packages that the contractor has won, including bid packages participating as a joint venture. This figure is calculating the total value of the entire joint venture. Because the participation rate in the joint venture is not announced, we do not have the basis to accurately separate the data for each member of the joint venture. The above figures may be larger than the actual figures that the contractor won.

  • Total bid-winning value as an independent party: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)
  • Total value of bidding packages participated in and won as a consortium: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice) (Winning bid value of all consortium members)
  • Lowest bid rate when participating: 99.48% (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
  • Average bid-winning price compared to the estimated price: 99.57% (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
  • Provinces after the merger where the contractor has participated in bidding: Undefined (2)
  • Provinces before the merger where the contractor has participated in bidding: Undefined (2)
  • Has relationships with 2 Bid Solicitors
  • Has competed against 0 contractors in 0 bidding packages, won 0 packages, lost 0 packages, 0 are pending results, and 0 were canceled.
  • Has collaborated with 1 contractors in 1 bidding packages, won 1 packages, lost 0 packages, 0 are pending results, and 0 were canceled.
  • Received 0 penalty decisions due to violations of bidding regulations.
The DauThau.info software compiles and analyzes information from the national bidding database
You need to Login or Sign up to view all informations.
You did not use the site, Click here to remain logged. Timeout: 60 second