| No. | Number of certificates | Category | Extended category | Rank | Expired date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
HCM-00032741 |
Thiết kế, thẩm tra thiết kế xây dựng công trình |
Thiết kế xây dựng (kiến trúc; kết cấu; điện - cơ điện; cấp - thoát nước) công trình Dân dụng |
III |
13/11/2029 |
3 |
HCM-00032741 |
Thi công xây dựng công trình |
Giao thông đường bộ |
III |
13/11/2029 |
4 |
HCM-00032741 |
Thi công xây dựng công trình |
Giao thông cầu |
III |
13/11/2029 |
5 |
HCM-00032741 |
Thi công xây dựng công trình |
Nông nghiệp và phát triển nông thôn thủy lợi |
III |
13/11/2029 |
6 |
HCM-00032741 |
Giám sát thi công xây dựng công trình |
Dân dụng |
III |
13/11/2029 |
7 |
HCM-00032741 |
Giám sát thi công xây dựng công trình |
Hạ tầng kỹ thuật cấp nước; thoát nước |
III |
13/11/2029 |
8 |
HCM-00032741 |
Giám sát thi công xây dựng công trình |
Giao thông đường bộ |
III |
13/11/2029 |
9 |
HCM-00032741 |
Giám sát thi công xây dựng công trình |
Giao thông cầu |
III |
13/11/2029 |
10 |
HCM-00032741 |
Giám sát thi công xây dựng công trình |
Nông nghiệp và phát triển nông thôn thủy lợi |
III |
13/11/2029 |
This construction organization is also a contractor. The results of data analysis for contractors CÔNG TY TNHH MỘT THÀNH VIÊN ĐẦU TƯ XÂY DỰNG PHÚC AN are as follows:
You need to Login or Sign up to view all informations.
- Participated in 8 bidding packages, of which 5 were won, 3 were lost, 0 are pending results, and 0 were canceled.
- Total value of winning bid packages (including joint ventures): VND (In which VND are designated bid packages; VND are bid packages with KQLCNT but no TBMT; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)
Note: This is the total value of the bid packages that the contractor has won, including bid packages participating as a joint venture. This figure is calculating the total value of the entire joint venture. Because the participation rate in the joint venture is not announced, we do not have the basis to accurately separate the data for each member of the joint venture. The above figures may be larger than the actual figures that the contractor won.
- Total bid-winning value as an independent party: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)
- Total value of bidding packages participated in and won as a consortium: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice) (Winning bid value of all consortium members)
- Lowest bid rate when participating: 74.76% (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
- Average bid-winning price compared to the estimated price: 96.41% (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
- Provinces after the merger where the contractor has participated in bidding: Cần Thơ (4), An Giang (1), Undefined (3)
- Provinces before the merger where the contractor has participated in bidding: Hậu Giang (3), Kiên Giang (1), Undefined (4)
- Has relationships with 6 Bid Solicitors
- Has competed against 23 contractors in 5 bidding packages, won 2 packages, lost 3 packages, 0 are pending results, and 0 were canceled.
- Has collaborated with 2 contractors in 2 bidding packages, won 1 packages, lost 1 packages, 0 are pending results, and 0 were canceled.
- Received 0 penalty decisions due to violations of bidding regulations.