| No. | Number of certificates | Category | Extended category | Rank | Expired date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
HCM-00065103 |
Thi công xây dựng công trình |
Thi công công tác xây dựng công trình dân dụng |
III |
29/06/2032 |
2 |
HCM-00065103 |
Thi công xây dựng công trình |
Thi công công tác xây dựng công trình công nghiệp năng lượng |
III |
29/06/2032 |
3 |
HCM-00065103 |
Thi công xây dựng công trình |
Thi công công tác xây dựng công trình hạ tầng kỹ thuật |
III |
29/06/2032 |
4 |
HCM-00065103 |
Thi công xây dựng công trình |
Thi công công tác xây dựng công trình giao thông đường bộ; cầu; đường thủy nội địa |
III |
29/06/2032 |
5 |
HCM-00065103 |
Thi công xây dựng công trình |
Thi công công tác xây dựng công trình phục vụ nông nghiệp và phát triển nông thôn thủy lợi, đê điều |
III |
29/06/2032 |
6 |
HCM-00065103 |
Thi công lắp đặt thiết bị vào công trình |
Dân dụng |
III |
29/06/2032 |
7 |
HCM-00065103 |
Thi công lắp đặt thiết bị vào công trình |
công nghiệp năng lượng |
III |
29/06/2032 |
8 |
HCM-00065103 |
Thi công lắp đặt thiết bị vào công trình |
Giao thông đường bộ |
III |
29/06/2032 |
This construction organization is also a contractor. The results of data analysis for contractors CÔNG TY TNHH DỊCH VỤ MÔI TRƯỜNG PHÚ GIA are as follows:
You need to Login or Sign up to view all informations.
- Participated in 100 bidding packages, of which 37 were won, 59 were lost, 4 are pending results, and 0 were canceled.
- Total value of winning bid packages (including joint ventures): VND (In which VND are designated bid packages; VND are bid packages with KQLCNT but no TBMT; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)
Note: This is the total value of the bid packages that the contractor has won, including bid packages participating as a joint venture. This figure is calculating the total value of the entire joint venture. Because the participation rate in the joint venture is not announced, we do not have the basis to accurately separate the data for each member of the joint venture. The above figures may be larger than the actual figures that the contractor won.
- Total bid-winning value as an independent party: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)
- Total value of bidding packages participated in and won as a consortium: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice) (Winning bid value of all consortium members)
- Lowest bid rate when participating: 50.34% (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
- Average bid-winning price compared to the estimated price: 70.39% (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
- Provinces after the merger where the contractor has participated in bidding: Tây Ninh (53), Đồng Nai (15), An Giang (9), Lâm Đồng (7), TP.Hồ Chí Minh (6), Cà Mau (2), Vĩnh Long (1), Đồng Tháp (1), Undefined (6)
- Provinces before the merger where the contractor has participated in bidding: Tây Ninh (50), Bình Phước (15), Kiên Giang (7), Bình Thuận (6), TP.Hồ Chí Minh (3), Bình Dương (3), An Giang (2), Cà Mau (1), Bến Tre (1), Bạc Liêu (1), Đồng Tháp (1), Long An (1), Lâm Đồng (1), Undefined (8)
- Has relationships with 44 Bid Solicitors
- Has competed against 155 contractors in 84 bidding packages, won 22 packages, lost 58 packages, 4 are pending results, and 0 were canceled.
- Has collaborated with 18 contractors in 28 bidding packages, won 10 packages, lost 18 packages, 0 are pending results, and 0 were canceled.
- Received 0 penalty decisions due to violations of bidding regulations.