| No. | Number of certificates | Category | Extended category | Rank | Expired date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
CAT-00077023 |
Tư vấn giám sát công tác xây dựng công trình |
hạ tầng kỹ thuật. |
III |
26/10/2033 |
2 |
CAT-00077023 |
Thi công xây dựng công trình |
hạ tầng kỹ thuật (Cấp nước, thoát nước; Xử lý chất thải rắn) |
III |
26/10/2033 |
This construction organization is also a contractor. The results of data analysis for contractors CÔNG TY TNHH DỊCH VỤ & CÔNG NGHỆ MÔI TRƯỜNG TÂN TIẾN are as follows:
You need to Login or Sign up to view all informations.
- Participated in 135 bidding packages, of which 51 were won, 64 were lost, 15 are pending results, and 5 were canceled.
- Total value of winning bid packages (including joint ventures): VND (In which VND are designated bid packages; VND are bid packages with KQLCNT but no TBMT; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)
Note: This is the total value of the bid packages that the contractor has won, including bid packages participating as a joint venture. This figure is calculating the total value of the entire joint venture. Because the participation rate in the joint venture is not announced, we do not have the basis to accurately separate the data for each member of the joint venture. The above figures may be larger than the actual figures that the contractor won.
- Total bid-winning value as an independent party: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)
- Total value of bidding packages participated in and won as a consortium: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice) (Winning bid value of all consortium members)
- Lowest bid rate when participating: 42.93% (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
- Average bid-winning price compared to the estimated price: 82.58% (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
- Provinces after the merger where the contractor has participated in bidding: Cần Thơ (43), TP.Hồ Chí Minh (21), An Giang (15), Vĩnh Long (11), Đà Nẵng (5), Đồng Tháp (4), Cà Mau (4), Đồng Nai (4), Sơn La (2), Khánh Hòa (2), Lào Cai (2), Quảng Ngãi (1), Tây Ninh (1), Lâm Đồng (1), Nationwide (1), Hà Nội (1), Điện Biên (1), Ninh Bình (1), Thanh Hoá (1), Hà Tĩnh (1), Cao Bằng (1), Thái Nguyên (1), Undefined (12)
- Provinces before the merger where the contractor has participated in bidding: Cần Thơ (14), Hậu Giang (13), TP.Hồ Chí Minh (9), Bà Rịa - Vũng Tàu (8), Trà Vinh (8), Kiên Giang (7), An Giang (6), Đà Nẵng (4), Bình Dương (4), Đồng Tháp (3), Bến Tre (3), Bạc Liêu (3), Sơn La (2), Bình Phước (2), Đồng Nai (2), Yên Bái (2), Quảng Ngãi (1), Long An (1), Cà Mau (1), Bình Thuận (1), Ninh Thuận (1), Khánh Hòa (1), Nationwide (1), Hà Nội (1), Tiền Giang (1), Điện Biên (1), Thanh Hoá (1), Hà Tĩnh (1), Cao Bằng (1), Thái Nguyên (1), Quảng Nam (1), Undefined (31)
- Has relationships with 103 Bid Solicitors
- Has competed against 132 contractors in 101 bidding packages, won 19 packages, lost 64 packages, 15 are pending results, and 3 were canceled.
- Has collaborated with 7 contractors in 11 bidding packages, won 3 packages, lost 8 packages, 0 are pending results, and 0 were canceled.
- Received 0 penalty decisions due to violations of bidding regulations.