| No. | Number of certificates | Category | Extended category | Rank | Expired date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
NIT-00017618 |
Tư vấn giám sát thi công xây dựng công trình |
Giám sát thi công xây dựng công trình Dân dụng và công nghiệp, Giao thông (Cầu, đường bộ), Thủy lợi, Hạ tầng kỹ thuật, lĩnh vực xây dựng và hoàn thiện |
III |
02/11/2028 |
2 |
NIT-00017618 |
Thi công xây dựng công trình |
Thi công xây dựng công trình Dân dụng và công nghiệp, Giao thông (Cầu, đường bộ), Thủy lợi, Hạ tầng kỹ thuật |
III |
02/11/2028 |
3 |
NIT-00017618 |
Tư vấn giám sát thi công xây dựng công trình |
Giám sát thi công xây dựng công trình Dân dụng và công nghiệp, Giao thông (Cầu, đường bộ), Thủy lợi, Hạ tầng kỹ thuật, lĩnh vực xây dựng và hoàn thiện |
III |
02/11/2028 |
4 |
NIT-00017618 |
Thi công xây dựng công trình |
Thi công xây dựng công trình Dân dụng và công nghiệp, Giao thông (Cầu, đường bộ), Thủy lợi, Hạ tầng kỹ thuật |
III |
02/11/2028 |
This construction organization is also a contractor. The results of data analysis for contractors CÔNG TY TNHH CÂY XANH NAM TRUNG BỘ are as follows:
You need to Login or Sign up to view all informations.
- Participated in 174 bidding packages, of which 99 were won, 64 were lost, 7 are pending results, and 4 were canceled.
- Total value of winning bid packages (including joint ventures): VND (In which VND are designated bid packages; VND are bid packages with KQLCNT but no TBMT; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)
Note: This is the total value of the bid packages that the contractor has won, including bid packages participating as a joint venture. This figure is calculating the total value of the entire joint venture. Because the participation rate in the joint venture is not announced, we do not have the basis to accurately separate the data for each member of the joint venture. The above figures may be larger than the actual figures that the contractor won.
- Total bid-winning value as an independent party: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)
- Total value of bidding packages participated in and won as a consortium: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice) (Winning bid value of all consortium members)
- Lowest bid rate when participating: 48.09% (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
- Average bid-winning price compared to the estimated price: 96.29% (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
- Provinces after the merger where the contractor has participated in bidding: Lâm Đồng (50), Khánh Hòa (31), TP.Hồ Chí Minh (19), Đồng Nai (18), Gia Lai (13), Quảng Ngãi (9), Tây Ninh (8), Đắk Lắk (6), An Giang (4), Đồng Tháp (3), Hải Phòng (3), Cà Mau (3), Cần Thơ (2), Phú Thọ (1), Hưng Yên (1), Đà Nẵng (1), Undefined (2)
- Provinces before the merger where the contractor has participated in bidding: Bình Thuận (25), Ninh Thuận (17), Đồng Nai (15), Đắk Nông (15), Bình Dương (14), Khánh Hòa (14), Gia Lai (12), Lâm Đồng (10), Tây Ninh (8), Kon Tum (7), Kiên Giang (4), Phú Yên (3), Bình Phước (3), Bà Rịa - Vũng Tàu (3), Hải Dương (3), Đắk Lắk (3), Quảng Ngãi (2), TP.Hồ Chí Minh (2), Tiền Giang (2), Cà Mau (2), Hậu Giang (1), Vĩnh Phúc (1), Bình Định (1), Thái Bình (1), Quảng Nam (1), Cần Thơ (1), Bạc Liêu (1), Đồng Tháp (1), Undefined (2)
- Has relationships with 106 Bid Solicitors
- Has competed against 202 contractors in 139 bidding packages, won 66 packages, lost 64 packages, 6 are pending results, and 3 were canceled.
- Has collaborated with 44 contractors in 77 bidding packages, won 48 packages, lost 27 packages, 1 are pending results, and 1 were canceled.
- Received 0 penalty decisions due to violations of bidding regulations.