| No. | Number of certificates | Category | Extended category | Rank | Expired date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
HCM-00082832 |
Thi công xây dựng công trình |
Thi công công tác xây dựng công trình hạ tầng kỹ thuật cấp nước, thoát nước |
III |
25/06/2034 |
2 |
HCM-00082832 |
Thi công xây dựng công trình |
Thi công công tác xây dựng công trình giao thông đường bộ; cầu; đường sắt |
III |
25/06/2034 |
3 |
HCM-00082832 |
Thi công xây dựng công trình |
Thi công công tác xây dựng công trình công nghiệp năng lượng (không bao gồm các nội dung về công nghệ thuộc chuyên ngành điện) điện mặt trời, đường dây và trạm biến áp |
III |
25/06/2034 |
4 |
HCM-00082832 |
Thi công lắp đặt thiết bị vào công trình |
Thi công lắp đặt thiết bị vào công trình hạ tầng kỹ thuật cấp nước, thoát nước |
III |
25/06/2034 |
5 |
HCM-00082832 |
Thi công lắp đặt thiết bị vào công trình |
Thi công lắp đặt thiết bị vào công trình giao thông đường bộ; cầu |
III |
25/06/2034 |
6 |
HCM-00082832 |
Thi công lắp đặt thiết bị vào công trình |
Thi công lắp đặt thiết bị vào công trình công nghiệp năng lượng đường dây và trạm biến áp |
III |
25/06/2034 |
This construction organization is also a contractor. The results of data analysis for contractors CANTHO TELECOMMUMICATION CONSTRUCTION AND INVESTMENT JOINT STOCK COMPANY are as follows:
You need to Login or Sign up to view all informations.
- Participated in 98 bidding packages, of which 66 were won, 31 were lost, 1 are pending results, and 0 were canceled.
- Total value of winning bid packages (including joint ventures): VND (In which VND are designated bid packages; VND are bid packages with KQLCNT but no TBMT; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)
Note: This is the total value of the bid packages that the contractor has won, including bid packages participating as a joint venture. This figure is calculating the total value of the entire joint venture. Because the participation rate in the joint venture is not announced, we do not have the basis to accurately separate the data for each member of the joint venture. The above figures may be larger than the actual figures that the contractor won.
- Total bid-winning value as an independent party: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)
- Total value of bidding packages participated in and won as a consortium: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice) (Winning bid value of all consortium members)
- Lowest bid rate when participating: 9.32% (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
- Average bid-winning price compared to the estimated price: 82.79% (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
- Provinces after the merger where the contractor has participated in bidding: Tây Ninh (14), An Giang (14), Đồng Tháp (12), Đồng Nai (6), Cần Thơ (5), Cà Mau (3), TP.Hồ Chí Minh (2), Vĩnh Long (2), Undefined (40)
- Provinces before the merger where the contractor has participated in bidding: Kiên Giang (14), Long An (13), Đồng Nai (6), Cần Thơ (4), Bạc Liêu (3), TP.Hồ Chí Minh (2), Bến Tre (2), Tây Ninh (1), Hậu Giang (1), Undefined (52)
- Has relationships with 13 Bid Solicitors
- Has competed against 38 contractors in 45 bidding packages, won 13 packages, lost 31 packages, 1 are pending results, and 0 were canceled.
- Has collaborated with 3 contractors in 3 bidding packages, won 1 packages, lost 2 packages, 0 are pending results, and 0 were canceled.
- Received 0 penalty decisions due to violations of bidding regulations.