Please verify that you are not a robot
Security Code
| No. | Number of certificates | Category | Extended category | Rank | Expired date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
VIP-00006176 |
Thiết kế, thẩm tra thiết kế xây dựng công trình |
Thiết kế, thẩm tra thiết kế xây dựng công trình: Giao thông đường bộ; Hạ tầng kỹ thuật. |
II |
12/06/2023 |
3 |
VIP-00006176 |
Quản lý dự án đầu tư xây dựng |
Quản lý dự án |
III |
12/06/2023 |
4 |
VIP-00006176 |
Khảo sát xây dựng |
Khảo sát địa hình, địa chất công trình |
II |
29/11/2022 |
5 |
VIP-00006176 |
Thiết kế, thẩm tra thiết kế xây dựng công trình |
Thiết kế, thẩm tra thiết kế xây dựng công trình Dân dụng |
II |
29/11/2022 |
6 |
VIP-00006176 |
Thiết kế, thẩm tra thiết kế xây dựng công trình |
Thiết kế, thẩm tra thiết kế xây dựng (công trình giao thông đường bộ, hạ tầng kỹ thuật) |
III |
29/11/2022 |
7 |
VIP-00006176 |
Giám sát thi công xây dựng công trình |
Giám sát thi công xây dựngcông trình Dân dụng |
II |
29/11/2022 |
8 |
VIP-00006176 |
Giám sát thi công xây dựng công trình |
Giám sát thi công xây dựng công trình Giao thông, Hạ tầng kỹ thuật. |
III |
29/11/2022 |
This construction organization is also a contractor. The results of data analysis for contractors VINHPHUC CONSULTANCY AND ARCHITECTURAL DESIGNING INVESTMENT JOINT STOCK COMPANY are as follows:
You need to Login or Sign up to view all informations.
- Participated in 36 bidding packages, of which 32 were won, 1 were lost, 2 are pending results, and 1 were canceled.
- Total value of winning bid packages (including joint ventures): VND (In which VND are designated bid packages; VND are bid packages with KQLCNT but no TBMT; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)
Note: This is the total value of the bid packages that the contractor has won, including bid packages participating as a joint venture. This figure is calculating the total value of the entire joint venture. Because the participation rate in the joint venture is not announced, we do not have the basis to accurately separate the data for each member of the joint venture. The above figures may be larger than the actual figures that the contractor won.
- Total bid-winning value as an independent party: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)
- Total value of bidding packages participated in and won as a consortium: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice) (Winning bid value of all consortium members)
- Lowest bid rate when participating: 69.78% (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
- Average bid-winning price compared to the estimated price: 99.96% (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
- Provinces participated in the bidding: Vĩnh Phúc (30), Undefined (6)
- Has relationships with 21 Bid Solicitors
- Has competed against 16 contractors in 17 bidding packages, won 13 packages, lost 1 packages, 2 are pending results, and 1 were canceled.
- Has collaborated with 11 contractors in 15 bidding packages, won 12 packages, lost 0 packages, 2 are pending results, and 1 were canceled.
- Received 0 penalty decisions due to violations of bidding regulations.