Please verify that you are not a robot
Security Code
| No. | Number of certificates | Category | Extended category | Rank | Expired date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
VIP-00004717 |
Giám sát thi công xây dựng công trình |
Giám sát thi công xây dựng công trình Thủy lợi. |
III |
09/05/2029 |
3 |
VIP-00004717 |
Giám sát thi công xây dựng công trình |
Giám sát công trình (dân dụng, giao thông đường bộ) |
II |
05/10/2022 |
4 |
VIP-00004717 |
Thi công xây dựng công trình |
Giám sát công trình Hạ tầng kỹ thuật |
III |
05/10/2022 |
5 |
VIP-00004717 |
Thi công xây dựng công trình |
Thi công xây dựng (công trình dân dụng, giao thông, hạ tầng kỹ thuật) |
III |
05/10/2022 |
6 |
VIP-00004717 |
Thi công xây dựng công trình |
Giao thông đường bộ |
II |
05/10/2022 |
7 |
VIP-00004717 |
Thi công xây dựng công trình |
Dân dụng |
II |
05/10/2022 |
8 |
VIP-00004717 |
Giám sát thi công xây dựng công trình |
Giao thông Cầu |
II |
22/06/2030 |
This construction organization is also a contractor. The results of data analysis for contractors AT6 VINA TECHNIQUE JOINT STOCK COMPANY are as follows:
You need to Login or Sign up to view all informations.
- Participated in 79 bidding packages, of which 73 were won, 3 were lost, 3 are pending results, and 0 were canceled.
- Total value of winning bid packages (including joint ventures): VND (In which VND are designated bid packages; VND are bid packages with KQLCNT but no TBMT; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)
Note: This is the total value of the bid packages that the contractor has won, including bid packages participating as a joint venture. This figure is calculating the total value of the entire joint venture. Because the participation rate in the joint venture is not announced, we do not have the basis to accurately separate the data for each member of the joint venture. The above figures may be larger than the actual figures that the contractor won.
- Total bid-winning value as an independent party: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)
- Total value of bidding packages participated in and won as a consortium: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice) (Winning bid value of all consortium members)
- Lowest bid rate when participating: 64.85% (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
- Average bid-winning price compared to the estimated price: 99.57% (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
- Provinces participated in the bidding: Vĩnh Phúc (45), Hà Tĩnh (2), Ninh Bình (1), Tuyên Quang (1), Hà Giang (1), Hưng Yên (1), Hà Nội (1), Undefined (27)
- Has relationships with 36 Bid Solicitors
- Has competed against 61 contractors in 35 bidding packages, won 30 packages, lost 3 packages, 2 are pending results, and 0 were canceled.
- Has collaborated with 35 contractors in 26 bidding packages, won 24 packages, lost 1 packages, 1 are pending results, and 0 were canceled.
- Received 0 penalty decisions due to violations of bidding regulations.