No. | Number of certificates | Category | Extended category | Rank | Expired date |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
HCM-00086317 |
Thi công xây dựng công trình |
Thi công công tác xây dựng công trình dân dụng |
III |
26/02/2035 |
2 |
HCM-00086317 |
Thi công lắp đặt thiết bị vào công trình |
Thi công lắp đặt thiết bị vào công trình |
III |
26/02/2035 |
This construction organization is also a contractor. The results of data analysis for contractors INDOCHINA TECHNOLOGY JOINT STOCK COMPANY are as follows:
You need to Login or Sign up to view all informations.
- Participated in 194 bidding packages, of which 115 were won, 72 were lost, 2 are pending results, and 5 were canceled.
- Total value of winning bid packages (including joint ventures): VND (In which VND are designated bid packages; VND are bid packages with KQLCNT but no TBMT; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)
Note: This is the total value of the bid packages that the contractor has won, including bid packages participating as a joint venture. This figure is calculating the total value of the entire joint venture. Because the participation rate in the joint venture is not announced, we do not have the basis to accurately separate the data for each member of the joint venture. The above figures may be larger than the actual figures that the contractor won.
- Total bid-winning value as an independent party: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)
- Total value of bidding packages participated in and won as a consortium: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice) (Winning bid value of all consortium members)
- Lowest bid rate when participating: 22.76% (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
- Average bid-winning price compared to the estimated price: 82.43% (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
- Provinces participated in the bidding: Hà Nội (52), TP.Hồ Chí Minh (35), Bắc Giang (9), Đà Nẵng (5), Lạng Sơn (4), Thanh Hoá (4), Quảng Ninh (4), Nationwide (4), Hưng Yên (2), Thừa Thiên - Huế (2), Bình Dương (2), Bắc Ninh (2), Cần Thơ (2), Đồng Nai (2), Hải Phòng (2), Kiên Giang (2), Long An (2), Khánh Hòa (2), Lâm Đồng (2), Quảng Nam (2), Bà Rịa - Vũng Tàu (2), Hải Dương (1), Sơn La (1), Undefined (83)
- Has relationships with 44 Bid Solicitors
- Has competed against 115 contractors in 103 bidding packages, won 26 packages, lost 72 packages, 2 are pending results, and 3 were canceled.
- Has collaborated with 18 contractors in 11 bidding packages, won 4 packages, lost 7 packages, 0 are pending results, and 0 were canceled.
- Received 0 penalty decisions due to violations of bidding regulations.