No. | Number of certificates | Category | Extended category | Rank | Expired date |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
BXD-00024897 |
Thi công xây dựng công trình |
Công nghiệp (đường dây và trạm biến áp) |
I |
29/05/2029 |
This construction organization is also a contractor. The results of data analysis for contractors LS-VINA CABLE & SYSTEM JOINT STOCK COMPANY are as follows:
You need to Login or Sign up to view all informations.
- Participated in 920 bidding packages, of which 165 were won, 698 were lost, 41 are pending results, and 16 were canceled.
- Total value of winning bid packages (including joint ventures): VND (In which VND are designated bid packages; VND are bid packages with KQLCNT but no TBMT; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)
Note: This is the total value of the bid packages that the contractor has won, including bid packages participating as a joint venture. This figure is calculating the total value of the entire joint venture. Because the participation rate in the joint venture is not announced, we do not have the basis to accurately separate the data for each member of the joint venture. The above figures may be larger than the actual figures that the contractor won.
- Total bid-winning value as an independent party: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)
- Total value of bidding packages participated in and won as a consortium: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice) (Winning bid value of all consortium members)
- Lowest bid rate when participating: 8.18% (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
- Average bid-winning price compared to the estimated price: 94.43% (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
- Provinces after the merger where the contractor has participated in bidding: TP.Hồ Chí Minh (211), Đà Nẵng (147), Hà Nội (82), Đồng Nai (57), Hải Phòng (48), Gia Lai (29), Cần Thơ (27), Đắk Lắk (27), Tây Ninh (27), Khánh Hòa (25), Quảng Ngãi (24), Quảng Trị (23), Cà Mau (17), Lâm Đồng (17), Vĩnh Long (16), Thừa Thiên - Huế (12), Nghệ An (12), Thanh Hoá (11), An Giang (10), Đồng Tháp (10), Phú Thọ (10), Hà Tĩnh (9), Ninh Bình (9), Lào Cai (7), Hưng Yên (6), Bắc Ninh (4), Sơn La (3), (3), Lai Châu (2), Quảng Ninh (1), Tuyên Quang (1), Undefined (153)
- Provinces before the merger where the contractor has participated in bidding: TP.Hồ Chí Minh (201), Đà Nẵng (122), Hà Nội (82), Đồng Nai (44), Hải Phòng (38), Quảng Nam (25), Bình Định (22), Khánh Hòa (21), Quảng Bình (20), Quảng Ngãi (19), Phú Yên (17), Long An (16), Đắk Lắk (15), Sóc Trăng (14), Bình Phước (13), Quảng Trị (13), Thừa Thiên - Huế (12), Nghệ An (12), Tây Ninh (11), Thanh Hoá (11), Đắk Nông (11), Cà Mau (10), Gia Lai (10), Cần Thơ (10), Hải Dương (9), Kon Tum (9), Hà Tĩnh (9), Nam Định (9), Bến Tre (7), Bà Rịa - Vũng Tàu (7), Bạc Liêu (7), Tiền Giang (7), Vĩnh Phúc (7), Yên Bái (7), Phú Thọ (7), Trà Vinh (6), Kiên Giang (6), Lâm Đồng (5), Thái Bình (5), Hưng Yên (5), Ninh Bình (5), Lào Cai (5), An Giang (4), Ninh Thuận (4), Bình Dương (4), Sơn La (3), Bắc Giang (3), Vĩnh Long (3), Đồng Tháp (3), Bình Thuận (3), (3), Lai Châu (2), Hậu Giang (2), Hòa Bình (1), Quảng Ninh (1), Bắc Ninh (1), Tuyên Quang (1), Undefined (156)
- Has relationships with 175 Bid Solicitors
- Has competed against 227 contractors in 855 bidding packages, won 101 packages, lost 697 packages, 42 are pending results, and 15 were canceled.
- Has collaborated with 33 contractors in 83 bidding packages, won 36 packages, lost 37 packages, 8 are pending results, and 2 were canceled.
- Received 0 penalty decisions due to violations of bidding regulations.