Please verify that you are not a robot
Security Code
| No. | Number of certificates | Category | Extended category | Rank | Expired date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
HAP-00006297 |
Khảo sát xây dựng |
III |
27/04/2030 |
|
3 |
HAP-00006297 |
Thiết kế, thẩm tra thiết kế xây dựng công trình |
Thiết kế, thẩm tra thiết kế kết cấu công trình công nghiệp nhẹ, đường dây điện và trạm biến áp |
III |
27/04/2030 |
4 |
HAP-00006297 |
Thiết kế, thẩm tra thiết kế xây dựng công trình |
Thiết kế, thẩm tra thiết kế cơ - điện công trình |
III |
27/04/2030 |
5 |
HAP-00006297 |
Thiết kế, thẩm tra thiết kế xây dựng công trình |
Thiết kế, thẩm tra thiết kế cấp - thoát nước công trình |
III |
27/04/2030 |
6 |
HAP-00006297 |
Giám sát thi công xây dựng công trình |
Giám sát thi công xây dựng công trình: công nghiệp (nhẹ, đường dây điện và trạm biến áp); đường bộ; cầu. |
III |
27/04/2030 |
7 |
HAP-00006297 |
Thi công xây dựng công trình |
Thi công xây dựng công trình dân dụng. |
II |
27/04/2030 |
8 |
HAP-00006297 |
Thi công xây dựng công trình |
Thi công xây dựng công trình: công nghiệp (nhẹ, đường dây điện và trạm biến áp); thủy lợi; đường bộ; cầu; hạ tầng kỹ thuật (trừ công trình xử lý chất thải rắn). |
III |
27/04/2030 |
This construction organization is also a contractor. The results of data analysis for contractors ANH MINH SANG JOINT STOCK COMPANY are as follows:
You need to Login or Sign up to view all informations.
- Participated in 130 bidding packages, of which 47 were won, 69 were lost, 4 are pending results, and 10 were canceled.
- Total value of winning bid packages (including joint ventures): VND (In which VND are designated bid packages; VND are bid packages with KQLCNT but no TBMT; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)
Note: This is the total value of the bid packages that the contractor has won, including bid packages participating as a joint venture. This figure is calculating the total value of the entire joint venture. Because the participation rate in the joint venture is not announced, we do not have the basis to accurately separate the data for each member of the joint venture. The above figures may be larger than the actual figures that the contractor won.
- Total bid-winning value as an independent party: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)
- Total value of bidding packages participated in and won as a consortium: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice) (Winning bid value of all consortium members)
- Lowest bid rate when participating: 44.59% (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
- Average bid-winning price compared to the estimated price: 95.9% (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
- Provinces participated in the bidding: Kiên Giang (78), Đà Nẵng (10), Cà Mau (8), Đồng Tháp (7), An Giang (6), Hậu Giang (3), Trà Vinh (2), Bến Tre (1), Cần Thơ (1), Sóc Trăng (1), Tiền Giang (1), Tây Ninh (1), Undefined (11)
- Has relationships with 29 Bid Solicitors
- Has competed against 99 contractors in 104 bidding packages, won 27 packages, lost 68 packages, 4 are pending results, and 5 were canceled.
- Has collaborated with 8 contractors in 11 bidding packages, won 3 packages, lost 7 packages, 0 are pending results, and 1 were canceled.
- Received 0 penalty decisions due to violations of bidding regulations.