| No. | Decision name | Certification period |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Certificate 613/GCN-BXD. | |
| 2 | Certificate 300/GCN-BXD |
This lab belongs to the contractor. The results of data analysis for contractor VIET NAM EXPRESSWAY CONSULTANT JOINT STOCK COMPANY are as follows:
You need to Login or Sign up to view all informations.
- Participated in 207 bidding packages, of which 194 were won, 12 were lost, 0 are pending results, and 1 were canceled.
- Total value of winning bid packages (including joint ventures): VND (In which VND are designated bid packages; VND are bid packages with KQLCNT but no TBMT; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)
Note: This is the total value of the bid packages that the contractor has won, including bid packages participating as a joint venture. This figure is calculating the total value of the entire joint venture. Because the participation rate in the joint venture is not announced, we do not have the basis to accurately separate the data for each member of the joint venture. The above figures may be larger than the actual figures that the contractor won.
- Total bid-winning value as an independent party: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)
- Total value of bidding packages participated in and won as a consortium: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice) (Winning bid value of all consortium members)
- Lowest bid rate when participating: 9.5% (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
- Average bid-winning price compared to the estimated price: 94.4% (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
- Provinces after the merger where the contractor has participated in bidding: Hà Nội (29), Ninh Bình (19), Phú Thọ (14), Bắc Ninh (13), Lào Cai (13), Tuyên Quang (7), Hưng Yên (6), TP.Hồ Chí Minh (3), Nghệ An (2), Hải Phòng (2), Vĩnh Long (2), Cần Thơ (2), Thanh Hoá (2), Thái Nguyên (2), Lai Châu (1), Đà Nẵng (1), Đắk Lắk (1), Tây Ninh (1), Đồng Tháp (1), An Giang (1), Lạng Sơn (1), Hà Tĩnh (1), Cà Mau (1), Quảng Ninh (1), Undefined (96)
- Provinces before the merger where the contractor has participated in bidding: Hà Nội (21), Bắc Giang (11), Vĩnh Phúc (8), Lào Cai (7), Ninh Bình (6), Hà Nam (6), Yên Bái (5), Nam Định (5), Hà Giang (4), Tuyên Quang (3), Hòa Bình (3), Phú Thọ (3), Nghệ An (2), TP.Hồ Chí Minh (2), Hưng Yên (2), Thanh Hoá (2), Bắc Ninh (1), Lai Châu (1), Thái Bình (1), Quảng Nam (1), Hải Phòng (1), Long An (1), Đồng Tháp (1), Bến Tre (1), Cần Thơ (1), Kiên Giang (1), Vĩnh Long (1), Lạng Sơn (1), Thái Nguyên (1), Hải Dương (1), Bắc Cạn (1), Sóc Trăng (1), Trà Vinh (1), Cà Mau (1), Quảng Ninh (1), Undefined (125)
- Has relationships with 77 Bid Solicitors
- Has competed against 71 contractors in 56 bidding packages, won 43 packages, lost 12 packages, 0 are pending results, and 1 were canceled.
- Has collaborated with 77 contractors in 63 bidding packages, won 58 packages, lost 4 packages, 0 are pending results, and 1 were canceled.
- Received 0 penalty decisions due to violations of bidding regulations.